0 of 20 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
Information
- Questions: 20
You have already completed the Test before. Hence you can not start it again.
Test is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the Test.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this Test:
Your results are here!! for" CAIIB Paper 4 Module C Quiz 10 "
0 of 20 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
Your Final Score is : 0
You have attempted : 0
Number of Correct Questions : 0 and scored 0
Number of Incorrect Questions : 0 and Negative marks 0
-
Not categorized
You have attempted: 0
Number of Correct Questions: 0 and scored 0
Number of Incorrect Questions: 0 and Negative marks 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 20
1. Question
Which action is most likely to undermine a bank’s position in a delayed-payment dispute under the MSMED Act?
Correct
Timely documentation of acceptance, objections and invoices is important. Ignoring statutory timelines can expose a buyer to interest and MSEFC proceedings.
Incorrect
Timely documentation of acceptance, objections and invoices is important. Ignoring statutory timelines can expose a buyer to interest and MSEFC proceedings.
Unattempted
Timely documentation of acceptance, objections and invoices is important. Ignoring statutory timelines can expose a buyer to interest and MSEFC proceedings.
-
Question 2 of 20
2. Question
A buyer claims that an oral agreement allows payment after 90 days to a micro supplier. What is the strongest statutory response?
Correct
The MSMED Act caps the agreed period in a written agreement at 45 days. Where no agreement exists, the Act’s appointed-day rules apply; a buyer cannot rely on an unlimited oral delay.
Incorrect
The MSMED Act caps the agreed period in a written agreement at 45 days. Where no agreement exists, the Act’s appointed-day rules apply; a buyer cannot rely on an unlimited oral delay.
Unattempted
The MSMED Act caps the agreed period in a written agreement at 45 days. Where no agreement exists, the Act’s appointed-day rules apply; a buyer cannot rely on an unlimited oral delay.
-
Question 3 of 20
3. Question
Which statement about the limitation period for a section 17 SARFAESI application is correct?
Correct
Section 17 generally allows an aggrieved person 45 days from the date of the measure under section 13(4) to apply to the DRT.
Incorrect
Section 17 generally allows an aggrieved person 45 days from the date of the measure under section 13(4) to apply to the DRT.
Unattempted
Section 17 generally allows an aggrieved person 45 days from the date of the measure under section 13(4) to apply to the DRT.
-
Question 4 of 20
4. Question
A borrower seeks to challenge the bank’s action under SARFAESI before a civil court rather than DRT. What should counsel consider first?
Correct
Section 34 restricts civil court jurisdiction over matters entrusted to the DRT/DRAT and limits injunctions. The DRT remedy under section 17 is central to challenges against section 13(4) measures.
Incorrect
Section 34 restricts civil court jurisdiction over matters entrusted to the DRT/DRAT and limits injunctions. The DRT remedy under section 17 is central to challenges against section 13(4) measures.
Unattempted
Section 34 restricts civil court jurisdiction over matters entrusted to the DRT/DRAT and limits injunctions. The DRT remedy under section 17 is central to challenges against section 13(4) measures.
-
Question 5 of 20
5. Question
Under the IBC, an appeal against an NCLT order by a person aggrieved is generally filed before:
Correct
The NCLAT is the appellate tribunal for NCLT orders under the IBC, subject to the Code’s provisions on who may appeal and the prescribed timeline.
Incorrect
The NCLAT is the appellate tribunal for NCLT orders under the IBC, subject to the Code’s provisions on who may appeal and the prescribed timeline.
Unattempted
The NCLAT is the appellate tribunal for NCLT orders under the IBC, subject to the Code’s provisions on who may appeal and the prescribed timeline.
-
Question 6 of 20
6. Question
Which is a key difference between an IBC resolution process and a conventional bank recovery suit?
Correct
IBC is designed as a collective process for insolvency resolution/liquidation and stakeholder coordination. A conventional recovery suit focuses on adjudication and recovery of a claim.
Incorrect
IBC is designed as a collective process for insolvency resolution/liquidation and stakeholder coordination. A conventional recovery suit focuses on adjudication and recovery of a claim.
Unattempted
IBC is designed as a collective process for insolvency resolution/liquidation and stakeholder coordination. A conventional recovery suit focuses on adjudication and recovery of a claim.
-
Question 7 of 20
7. Question
Which is the most appropriate response if a bank discovers a potential limitation problem before filing a recovery case?
Correct
The bank should conduct a documented limitation analysis, including acknowledgments, part-payments, applicable articles and possible statutory exclusions. Records must never be falsified or destroyed to evade limitation.
Incorrect
The bank should conduct a documented limitation analysis, including acknowledgments, part-payments, applicable articles and possible statutory exclusions. Records must never be falsified or destroyed to evade limitation.
Unattempted
The bank should conduct a documented limitation analysis, including acknowledgments, part-payments, applicable articles and possible statutory exclusions. Records must never be falsified or destroyed to evade limitation.
-
Question 8 of 20
8. Question
Which of the following is a core feature of section 18 of the Limitation Act?
Correct
Section 18 requires a written and signed acknowledgment of liability made before expiry of the existing limitation period, starting a fresh period from the date of signature.
Incorrect
Section 18 requires a written and signed acknowledgment of liability made before expiry of the existing limitation period, starting a fresh period from the date of signature.
Unattempted
Section 18 requires a written and signed acknowledgment of liability made before expiry of the existing limitation period, starting a fresh period from the date of signature.
-
Question 9 of 20
9. Question
A bank seeks to rely on an acknowledgment signed by a company’s branch accountant. What is the key issue?
Correct
The bank should establish that the signatory had authority to acknowledge liability for the company. The validity of the acknowledgment depends on authority, wording and timing.
Incorrect
The bank should establish that the signatory had authority to acknowledge liability for the company. The validity of the acknowledgment depends on authority, wording and timing.
Unattempted
The bank should establish that the signatory had authority to acknowledge liability for the company. The validity of the acknowledgment depends on authority, wording and timing.
-
Question 10 of 20
10. Question
Which statement about limitation in the context of a mortgage and personal guarantee is most accurate?
Correct
A mortgage enforcement claim and a claim under a personal guarantee may be governed by different limitation articles and accrual rules. Each should be analysed independently.
Incorrect
A mortgage enforcement claim and a claim under a personal guarantee may be governed by different limitation articles and accrual rules. Each should be analysed independently.
Unattempted
A mortgage enforcement claim and a claim under a personal guarantee may be governed by different limitation articles and accrual rules. Each should be analysed independently.
-
Question 11 of 20
11. Question
Under the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act, what is the role of the bank’s authorised officer when certifying records?
Correct
The authorised officer certifies the copy/record in the prescribed manner. The certificate supports evidentiary admissibility; it does not decide the legal merits.
Incorrect
The authorised officer certifies the copy/record in the prescribed manner. The certificate supports evidentiary admissibility; it does not decide the legal merits.
Unattempted
The authorised officer certifies the copy/record in the prescribed manner. The certificate supports evidentiary admissibility; it does not decide the legal merits.
-
Question 12 of 20
12. Question
Which of the following best describes the scope of the Legal Services Authorities Act?
Correct
The Act establishes legal services authorities and provides for Lok Adalats and related mechanisms to promote access to justice under statutory conditions.
Incorrect
The Act establishes legal services authorities and provides for Lok Adalats and related mechanisms to promote access to justice under statutory conditions.
Unattempted
The Act establishes legal services authorities and provides for Lok Adalats and related mechanisms to promote access to justice under statutory conditions.
-
Question 13 of 20
13. Question
A dispute about a non-compoundable criminal offence is proposed for settlement before a regular Lok Adalat. What is the correct view?
Correct
Lok Adalats do not have jurisdiction over matters relating to offences that are not compoundable under law, even if parties wish to settle.
Incorrect
Lok Adalats do not have jurisdiction over matters relating to offences that are not compoundable under law, even if parties wish to settle.
Unattempted
Lok Adalats do not have jurisdiction over matters relating to offences that are not compoundable under law, even if parties wish to settle.
-
Question 14 of 20
14. Question
Which statement about Permanent Lok Adalats is most accurate?
Correct
Permanent Lok Adalats have a special jurisdiction for public utility service disputes. After attempting conciliation, they may decide the dispute on merits within statutory limits if settlement fails.
Incorrect
Permanent Lok Adalats have a special jurisdiction for public utility service disputes. After attempting conciliation, they may decide the dispute on merits within statutory limits if settlement fails.
Unattempted
Permanent Lok Adalats have a special jurisdiction for public utility service disputes. After attempting conciliation, they may decide the dispute on merits within statutory limits if settlement fails.
-
Question 15 of 20
15. Question
A bank wants to use Lok Adalat for a compromise in a recovery case. Which preparation is most useful?
Correct
A precise written settlement supported by account records and properly authorised signatories reduces ambiguity and supports a clear award and enforceability.
Incorrect
A precise written settlement supported by account records and properly authorised signatories reduces ambiguity and supports a clear award and enforceability.
Unattempted
A precise written settlement supported by account records and properly authorised signatories reduces ambiguity and supports a clear award and enforceability.
-
Question 16 of 20
16. Question
Which of the following is most closely linked to the statutory delayed-payment interest under MSMED Act section 16?
Correct
Section 16 prescribes compound interest with monthly rests at three times the bank rate notified by RBI, subject to the statutory circumstances.
Incorrect
Section 16 prescribes compound interest with monthly rests at three times the bank rate notified by RBI, subject to the statutory circumstances.
Unattempted
Section 16 prescribes compound interest with monthly rests at three times the bank rate notified by RBI, subject to the statutory circumstances.
-
Question 17 of 20
17. Question
A micro supplier has an unpaid invoice but has not established that it qualifies under the MSMED Act. What should a bank or buyer verify?
Correct
The availability of the Act’s delayed-payment protection depends on whether the supplier meets the statutory definition and applicable registration/classification requirements. This should be verified from reliable records.
Incorrect
The availability of the Act’s delayed-payment protection depends on whether the supplier meets the statutory definition and applicable registration/classification requirements. This should be verified from reliable records.
Unattempted
The availability of the Act’s delayed-payment protection depends on whether the supplier meets the statutory definition and applicable registration/classification requirements. This should be verified from reliable records.
-
Question 18 of 20
18. Question
Which statement about a resolution plan under IBC is correct?
Correct
The CoC exercises commercial judgment on plan approval, while NCLT examines compliance with section 30(2) and other statutory requirements. The tribunal’s role is not to replace commercial wisdom with its own.
Incorrect
The CoC exercises commercial judgment on plan approval, while NCLT examines compliance with section 30(2) and other statutory requirements. The tribunal’s role is not to replace commercial wisdom with its own.
Unattempted
The CoC exercises commercial judgment on plan approval, while NCLT examines compliance with section 30(2) and other statutory requirements. The tribunal’s role is not to replace commercial wisdom with its own.
-
Question 19 of 20
19. Question
What is the usual purpose of an interim resolution professional after CIRP admission?
Correct
The interim resolution professional performs statutory duties after admission, including managing the corporate debtor’s affairs as prescribed, receiving claims and constituting the CoC.
Incorrect
The interim resolution professional performs statutory duties after admission, including managing the corporate debtor’s affairs as prescribed, receiving claims and constituting the CoC.
Unattempted
The interim resolution professional performs statutory duties after admission, including managing the corporate debtor’s affairs as prescribed, receiving claims and constituting the CoC.
-
Question 20 of 20
20. Question
Which statement about liquidation under IBC is correct?
Correct
Liquidation is ordered under section 33 when statutory grounds arise. It is not an automatic consequence of every default and must follow the Code’s process.
Incorrect
Liquidation is ordered under section 33 when statutory grounds arise. It is not an automatic consequence of every default and must follow the Code’s process.
Unattempted
Liquidation is ordered under section 33 when statutory grounds arise. It is not an automatic consequence of every default and must follow the Code’s process.