0 of 20 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
Information
- Questions: 20
You have already completed the Test before. Hence you can not start it again.
Test is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the Test.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this Test:
Your results are here!! for" CAIIB Paper 4 Module B Quiz 5 "
0 of 20 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
Your Final Score is : 0
You have attempted : 0
Number of Correct Questions : 0 and scored 0
Number of Incorrect Questions : 0 and Negative marks 0
-
Not categorized
You have attempted: 0
Number of Correct Questions: 0 and scored 0
Number of Incorrect Questions: 0 and Negative marks 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 20
1. Question
What is the regulatory rationale for RBI seeking information from or inspecting a payment-system operator?
Correct
Regulatory information and inspection powers support oversight of payment systems and help RBI assess compliance, resilience and risks. They do not mean RBI operates every private system or sets unrelated commercial decisions.
Incorrect
Regulatory information and inspection powers support oversight of payment systems and help RBI assess compliance, resilience and risks. They do not mean RBI operates every private system or sets unrelated commercial decisions.
Unattempted
Regulatory information and inspection powers support oversight of payment systems and help RBI assess compliance, resilience and risks. They do not mean RBI operates every private system or sets unrelated commercial decisions.
-
Question 2 of 20
2. Question
Why may notice of assignment to the account debtor be important?
Correct
Notice can be important to establish that the debtor should direct payment to the assignee and to manage competing claims or discharge issues. Its precise effect depends on the type of assignment, governing law and contractual terms.
Incorrect
Notice can be important to establish that the debtor should direct payment to the assignee and to manage competing claims or discharge issues. Its precise effect depends on the type of assignment, governing law and contractual terms.
Unattempted
Notice can be important to establish that the debtor should direct payment to the assignee and to manage competing claims or discharge issues. Its precise effect depends on the type of assignment, governing law and contractual terms.
-
Question 3 of 20
3. Question
A borrower owes a bank money individually but holds a deposit jointly with another person. What should the bank do before setting off?
Correct
Set-off requires careful analysis of mutuality and capacity. An individual debt and joint deposit may not satisfy the requirements, and the rights of the co-depositor and account mandate matter. The bank should obtain legal review where appropriate.
Incorrect
Set-off requires careful analysis of mutuality and capacity. An individual debt and joint deposit may not satisfy the requirements, and the rights of the co-depositor and account mandate matter. The bank should obtain legal review where appropriate.
Unattempted
Set-off requires careful analysis of mutuality and capacity. An individual debt and joint deposit may not satisfy the requirements, and the rights of the co-depositor and account mandate matter. The bank should obtain legal review where appropriate.
-
Question 4 of 20
4. Question
Why should the bank obtain and retain evidence when releasing a company‘s registered charge?
Correct
A discharge/release record supports the statutory satisfaction filing and clarifies that the security has been released. The lender should reconcile outstanding obligations, execute the appropriate release and ensure the public charge record is updated as required.
Incorrect
A discharge/release record supports the statutory satisfaction filing and clarifies that the security has been released. The lender should reconcile outstanding obligations, execute the appropriate release and ensure the public charge record is updated as required.
Unattempted
A discharge/release record supports the statutory satisfaction filing and clarifies that the security has been released. The lender should reconcile outstanding obligations, execute the appropriate release and ensure the public charge record is updated as required.
-
Question 5 of 20
5. Question
During an internal AML review, an account file lacks a clear audit trail for an unusual transaction. What is the strongest corrective action?
Correct
A reliable audit trail is essential for demonstrating risk assessment, investigation and reporting decisions. The bank should preserve original records, document the gap and remediation, and escalate material deficiencies. Fabricating or deleting records undermines legal and compliance obligations.
Incorrect
A reliable audit trail is essential for demonstrating risk assessment, investigation and reporting decisions. The bank should preserve original records, document the gap and remediation, and escalate material deficiencies. Fabricating or deleting records undermines legal and compliance obligations.
Unattempted
A reliable audit trail is essential for demonstrating risk assessment, investigation and reporting decisions. The bank should preserve original records, document the gap and remediation, and escalate material deficiencies. Fabricating or deleting records undermines legal and compliance obligations.
-
Question 6 of 20
6. Question
A customer‘s account receives funds from unrelated third parties with no apparent business rationale. Which conclusion is appropriate?
Correct
Unexplained third-party flows can be a red flag but are not proof by themselves. The bank should assess the customer‘s profile and transaction rationale, investigate and report where the prescribed suspicion threshold is met, while avoiding tipping off.
Incorrect
Unexplained third-party flows can be a red flag but are not proof by themselves. The bank should assess the customer‘s profile and transaction rationale, investigate and report where the prescribed suspicion threshold is met, while avoiding tipping off.
Unattempted
Unexplained third-party flows can be a red flag but are not proof by themselves. The bank should assess the customer‘s profile and transaction rationale, investigate and report where the prescribed suspicion threshold is met, while avoiding tipping off.
-
Question 7 of 20
7. Question
A cheque contains an alteration to the payee name that is not authenticated. What should the paying bank consider?
Correct
An alteration affecting the payee or payment rights may be material. The bank should determine whether it is authorised and authenticated under the applicable law and banking procedures. A small amount does not remove the duty to examine irregularities.
Incorrect
An alteration affecting the payee or payment rights may be material. The bank should determine whether it is authorised and authenticated under the applicable law and banking procedures. A small amount does not remove the duty to examine irregularities.
Unattempted
An alteration affecting the payee or payment rights may be material. The bank should determine whether it is authorised and authenticated under the applicable law and banking procedures. A small amount does not remove the duty to examine irregularities.
-
Question 8 of 20
8. Question
A drawer raises credible evidence that a cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable debt. How should the statutory presumption be treated?
Correct
Statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act are generally rebuttable. The court evaluates the defence and evidence under the applicable standard. A bank cannot conclusively determine the criminal case merely from the customer‘s allegation.
Incorrect
Statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act are generally rebuttable. The court evaluates the defence and evidence under the applicable standard. A bank cannot conclusively determine the criminal case merely from the customer‘s allegation.
Unattempted
Statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act are generally rebuttable. The court evaluates the defence and evidence under the applicable standard. A bank cannot conclusively determine the criminal case merely from the customer‘s allegation.
-
Question 9 of 20
9. Question
A remittance application states a purpose inconsistent with the supporting invoice. What should the authorised dealer do?
Correct
Purpose and supporting documentation must be consistent with the transaction and current regulatory requirements. The authorised dealer should seek clarification, conduct appropriate checks and escalate suspected misrepresentation rather than alter records or bypass controls.
Incorrect
Purpose and supporting documentation must be consistent with the transaction and current regulatory requirements. The authorised dealer should seek clarification, conduct appropriate checks and escalate suspected misrepresentation rather than alter records or bypass controls.
Unattempted
Purpose and supporting documentation must be consistent with the transaction and current regulatory requirements. The authorised dealer should seek clarification, conduct appropriate checks and escalate suspected misrepresentation rather than alter records or bypass controls.
-
Question 10 of 20
10. Question
A transaction involves a person resident outside India. What is the best starting point for a bank‘s FEMA assessment?
Correct
FEMA compliance depends on residency status, transaction classification, account type, and applicable rules and permissions. A non-resident connection does not make every transaction prohibited or automatically permissible; the bank must apply the relevant framework.
Incorrect
FEMA compliance depends on residency status, transaction classification, account type, and applicable rules and permissions. A non-resident connection does not make every transaction prohibited or automatically permissible; the bank must apply the relevant framework.
Unattempted
FEMA compliance depends on residency status, transaction classification, account type, and applicable rules and permissions. A non-resident connection does not make every transaction prohibited or automatically permissible; the bank must apply the relevant framework.
-
Question 11 of 20
11. Question
A payment operator proposes a major change to its system. What is the prudent regulatory approach?
Correct
Payment-system authorisation and directions may impose conditions relating to material changes, governance, risk management and reporting. The operator should check the current requirements and ensure changes do not compromise safety, compliance or continuity.
Incorrect
Payment-system authorisation and directions may impose conditions relating to material changes, governance, risk management and reporting. The operator should check the current requirements and ensure changes do not compromise safety, compliance or continuity.
Unattempted
Payment-system authorisation and directions may impose conditions relating to material changes, governance, risk management and reporting. The operator should check the current requirements and ensure changes do not compromise safety, compliance or continuity.
-
Question 12 of 20
12. Question
A bank wants possession of goods as collateral and the goods can be delivered. Which security mode most naturally involves delivery of possession?
Correct
Pledge is a bailment of goods as security and ordinarily involves delivery of possession to the pawnee. Hypothecation usually leaves possession with the borrower, while assignment and set-off concern different legal mechanisms.
Incorrect
Pledge is a bailment of goods as security and ordinarily involves delivery of possession to the pawnee. Hypothecation usually leaves possession with the borrower, while assignment and set-off concern different legal mechanisms.
Unattempted
Pledge is a bailment of goods as security and ordinarily involves delivery of possession to the pawnee. Hypothecation usually leaves possession with the borrower, while assignment and set-off concern different legal mechanisms.
-
Question 13 of 20
13. Question
Why does the statutory definition of mortgage refer to specific immovable property?
Correct
A mortgage transfers an interest in specific immovable property to secure an obligation. Identification of the property and secured obligation is fundamental to determining the security‘s scope and enforceability.
Incorrect
A mortgage transfers an interest in specific immovable property to secure an obligation. Identification of the property and secured obligation is fundamental to determining the security‘s scope and enforceability.
Unattempted
A mortgage transfers an interest in specific immovable property to secure an obligation. Identification of the property and secured obligation is fundamental to determining the security‘s scope and enforceability.
-
Question 14 of 20
14. Question
A company charge is created. What should the bank‘s operations/legal team verify promptly?
Correct
The applicable deadline and filing requirements should be verified under the current Companies Act, rules and MCA procedures. Prompt review reduces the risk that a filing defect prejudices the security. The exact period and process should not be guessed from outdated material.
Incorrect
The applicable deadline and filing requirements should be verified under the current Companies Act, rules and MCA procedures. Prompt review reduces the risk that a filing defect prejudices the security. The exact period and process should not be guessed from outdated material.
Unattempted
The applicable deadline and filing requirements should be verified under the current Companies Act, rules and MCA procedures. Prompt review reduces the risk that a filing defect prejudices the security. The exact period and process should not be guessed from outdated material.
-
Question 15 of 20
15. Question
A bank is onboarding a company with layered ownership. Which action best supports PMLA/KYC compliance?
Correct
The bank should look through ownership/control layers and identify beneficial owners as required by the current KYC/PMLA framework. Incorporation does not automatically remove beneficial-ownership obligations, and customer data should not be published indiscriminately.
Incorrect
The bank should look through ownership/control layers and identify beneficial owners as required by the current KYC/PMLA framework. Incorporation does not automatically remove beneficial-ownership obligations, and customer data should not be published indiscriminately.
Unattempted
The bank should look through ownership/control layers and identify beneficial owners as required by the current KYC/PMLA framework. Incorporation does not automatically remove beneficial-ownership obligations, and customer data should not be published indiscriminately.
-
Question 16 of 20
16. Question
A lawfully issued request seeks prescribed transaction information. What should the bank do?
Correct
The reporting entity should preserve relevant records and furnish prescribed information through the competent channel, subject to verification of the request and applicable law. Records should not be destroyed or disclosed to unrelated parties.
Incorrect
The reporting entity should preserve relevant records and furnish prescribed information through the competent channel, subject to verification of the request and applicable law. Records should not be destroyed or disclosed to unrelated parties.
Unattempted
The reporting entity should preserve relevant records and furnish prescribed information through the competent channel, subject to verification of the request and applicable law. Records should not be destroyed or disclosed to unrelated parties.
-
Question 17 of 20
17. Question
A high-value cash transaction is inconsistent with a customer‘s stated income. What should happen?
Correct
The mismatch is a potential red flag and calls for risk-based assessment, documentation and escalation. Cash is not inherently unlawful, and unusual activity does not itself establish guilt.
Incorrect
The mismatch is a potential red flag and calls for risk-based assessment, documentation and escalation. Cash is not inherently unlawful, and unusual activity does not itself establish guilt.
Unattempted
The mismatch is a potential red flag and calls for risk-based assessment, documentation and escalation. Cash is not inherently unlawful, and unusual activity does not itself establish guilt.
-
Question 18 of 20
18. Question
Which description best fits a bill of exchange?
Correct
A bill of exchange is defined by statutory elements including a written unconditional order, signature, direction to a specified person and payment of a certain sum. A passbook or land document serves a different function.
Incorrect
A bill of exchange is defined by statutory elements including a written unconditional order, signature, direction to a specified person and payment of a certain sum. A passbook or land document serves a different function.
Unattempted
A bill of exchange is defined by statutory elements including a written unconditional order, signature, direction to a specified person and payment of a certain sum. A passbook or land document serves a different function.
-
Question 19 of 20
19. Question
Which feature is essential to a promissory note?
Correct
A promissory note requires a written unconditional undertaking signed by the maker to pay a certain sum, meeting the Act‘s requirements. A mere oral promise or conditional statement does not satisfy the statutory definition.
Incorrect
A promissory note requires a written unconditional undertaking signed by the maker to pay a certain sum, meeting the Act‘s requirements. A mere oral promise or conditional statement does not satisfy the statutory definition.
Unattempted
A promissory note requires a written unconditional undertaking signed by the maker to pay a certain sum, meeting the Act‘s requirements. A mere oral promise or conditional statement does not satisfy the statutory definition.
-
Question 20 of 20
20. Question
Under the NI Act, what does a special crossing generally identify?
Correct
A special crossing names a banker and directs payment through that banker under the Act. It is different from a general crossing and does not alter the currency or cheque validity period.
Incorrect
A special crossing names a banker and directs payment through that banker under the Act. It is different from a general crossing and does not alter the currency or cheque validity period.
Unattempted
A special crossing names a banker and directs payment through that banker under the Act. It is different from a general crossing and does not alter the currency or cheque validity period.