Accounting Research
Accounting research refers to the systematic study of accounting and its relationship with economic activities, organisations, and society. It examines the effects of economic events on the accounting process and studies how changes or events in the economy influence the recording, measurement, and reporting of accounting information.
Accounting research also examines the effects of reported accounting information on economic events. Financial and accounting information communicated through reports may influence economic activities and decisions. Therefore, researchers study how reported information interacts with economic events.
Another important area of accounting research is the study of the role of accounting in organisations and society. Accounting is not limited to recording transactions; it also operates within organisations and the wider social environment. Accounting research studies these broader roles and their effects.
The scope of accounting research is broad and covers different accounting subject areas. It includes research relating to financial accounting, management accounting, auditing, and taxation. Thus, accounting research may examine both financial reporting and various specialised areas of accounting practice.
Persons Conducting Accounting Research
Accounting research is carried out by both academic researchers and practising accountants. Academic researchers generally study accounting issues through formal research methods, while practising accountants may conduct research based on accounting practice and professional activities.
Different research methodologies are used in academic accounting research. The selection of a research method depends on the nature of the accounting issue or research question being examined.
Archival Research
Archival research examines objective data collected from existing repositories. Under this method, researchers use information that has already been collected and stored in different sources or repositories.
The researcher examines such objective data to study accounting-related issues. Therefore, archival research primarily depends on existing recorded data rather than data created through direct experimental treatment.
Experimental Research
Experimental research examines data collected by the researcher through the administration of treatments to subjects. In this method, the researcher gathers information by conducting an experiment involving research subjects.
The data generated from these treatments is then examined to study a particular accounting research question. Thus, experimental research involves the researcher’s direct role in collecting data through an experimental process.
Analytical Research
Analytical research is based on the formal modelling of theories or the expression and support of ideas in mathematical terms.
Under this approach, accounting theories or concepts may be formally represented through models. Mathematical techniques are used to explain or substantiate ideas. Therefore, analytical research gives importance to formal theoretical and mathematical analysis.
Interpretive Research
Interpretive research emphasises the role of language, interpretation, and understanding in accounting practice. It studies accounting by examining how people interpret and understand accounting practices and information.
This research approach highlights the symbolic structures and commonly accepted themes that shape the way the world is understood in different ways. Therefore, interpretive research examines the meaning and interpretation associated with accounting practices rather than focusing only on numerical information.
Critical Research
Critical research focuses on the role of power and conflict in accounting practice. It studies how power relationships and conflicts may influence accounting practices and accounting systems.
The critical research approach therefore examines accounting from the perspective of organisational and social relationships involving power and conflict.
Other Accounting Research Methods
Accounting research may also be conducted through case studies, computer simulation, and field research. Case studies involve detailed examination of specific situations or cases. Computer simulation uses computer-based models to study accounting-related issues, while field research examines accounting activities in actual practical environments.
Thus, accounting research uses a wide range of methodologies depending on the type of accounting issue being studied.
Publication of Accounting Research
Empirical studies have found that leading accounting journals collectively publish fewer research articles than comparable journals in economics and other business disciplines.
As a result, accounting scholars are relatively less successful in academic publishing than their peers in other business school disciplines. The lower number of published research articles creates greater competition for publication in leading accounting journals.
Publication rates also differ between accounting and other business disciplines. A study based on academic author rankings concluded that the competitive value of a single publication in a top-ranked journal is highest in accounting and lowest in marketing.
This means that because publication opportunities in leading accounting journals are relatively limited, a single publication in a highly ranked accounting journal carries significant competitive value.
Accounting Scandals
An accounting scandal generally involves serious problems relating to financial information, accounting practices, auditing, or corporate financial reporting. Major financial information frauds can affect investors, organisations, auditors, and the wider financial system.
The year 2001 witnessed a series of major financial information frauds involving several well-known corporations and organisations. These included Enron, Arthur Andersen, WorldCom, Qwest, and Sunbeam.
These financial frauds raised serious questions about the effectiveness of accounting standards, auditing regulations, and corporate governance principles. The scandals demonstrated that weaknesses in financial reporting and auditing systems could lead to serious financial consequences.
In some cases, the management manipulated figures presented in financial reports to show better economic performance than the actual performance of the company. Such manipulation created a misleading picture of the financial condition or results of the organisation.
In other cases, tax and regulatory incentives encouraged companies to become over-leveraged. Over-leveraging refers to a situation involving excessive use of debt. These incentives also encouraged decisions involving extraordinary and unjustified risks.
Enron Scandal and Its Impact
The Enron scandal had a major impact on the development of accounting and financial reporting regulations. The scandal contributed to the development of new regulations intended to improve the reliability of financial reporting.
It also increased public awareness regarding the importance of accounting standards that accurately reflect the financial reality of companies. Financial reports should present financial information in a manner that represents the actual economic condition of an organisation.
The Enron scandal also highlighted the importance of the objectivity and independence of auditing firms. Auditors are expected to conduct their work independently and objectively while examining financial statements.
The Enron scandal resulted in the largest bankruptcy reorganisation in American history at that time and is also regarded as one of the biggest audit failures. The scandal led to the dissolution of Arthur Andersen, which was then one of the five largest accounting firms in the world.
During the 1990s, a series of irregular accounting procedures had been carried out at Enron. After these irregularities were revealed, Enron filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in December 2001.
Sarbanes–Oxley Act, 2002
One major consequence of the accounting scandals was the enactment of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 in the United States in 2002. The law was passed following the initial admissions of fraudulent behaviour connected with Enron.
The Sarbanes–Oxley Act significantly increased criminal penalties for securities fraud. It also introduced stronger penalties for the destruction, alteration, or fabrication of records in federal investigations.
The Act also increased penalties relating to any scheme or attempt to defraud shareholders. Thus, the legislation strengthened the legal consequences of fraudulent conduct relating to financial records, securities, and shareholders.
Accounting Fraud and Error
Accounting records may contain incorrect information because of either fraud or error. The major difference between fraud and error is the presence or absence of intention.
Accounting Fraud
Accounting fraud is an intentional misstatement or omission in accounting records by management or employees involving the use of deception. The person deliberately provides incorrect information or intentionally leaves out information from accounting records.
The important element of accounting fraud is intentional deception. Fraud may be committed by management or employees and may also involve collusion with third parties. Collusion means that two or more persons or parties work together in carrying out the fraudulent activity.
Accounting fraud is a criminal act and a breach of civil tort. Therefore, fraudulent accounting activities may result in criminal as well as civil legal consequences.
Accounting Error
An accounting error is an unintentional misstatement or omission in accounting records. Unlike fraud, an accounting error does not involve deliberate deception.
An error may occur because of the misinterpretation of facts, mistakes in processing data, or oversight resulting in incorrect estimates. These mistakes may cause accounting records or financial information to be incorrect even though there was no intention to deceive.
Acts resulting in accounting errors are not criminal acts. However, they may result in a breach of civil law. For example, an accounting error may involve the tort of negligence.
Therefore, the key distinction is that fraud is intentional and involves deception, whereas an error is unintentional.
Responsibility for Prevention and Detection of Fraud and Errors
The primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud and errors rests with the management of the entity.
Management is therefore responsible for establishing appropriate measures to prevent fraudulent activities and accounting mistakes. It also has primary responsibility for identifying fraud and errors affecting the organisation’s accounting records.
Exam Focus
Accounting research studies the effect of economic events on accounting, the effect of reported information on economic events, and the role of accounting in organisations and society. Important accounting research methodologies include archival, experimental, analytical, interpretive, and critical research, along with case studies, computer simulation, and field research.
The 2001 financial information frauds highlighted weaknesses in accounting standards, auditing regulations, and corporate governance. The Enron scandal increased the importance of reliable financial reporting and auditor independence. Enron filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in December 2001, and the scandal contributed to the dissolution of Arthur Andersen.
The Sarbanes–Oxley Act was passed in the United States in 2002 and significantly increased criminal penalties relating to securities fraud and fraudulent financial records.
The most important difference between fraud and error is intention. Fraud is an intentional misstatement or omission involving deception, while an error is an unintentional misstatement or omission. The primary responsibility for preventing and detecting fraud and errors rests with the entity’s management.