A mis-statement in a prospectus is a statement that is untrue or misleading. Mis-statements can be made intentionally or unintentionally.
Remedies for mis-statements in a prospectus
There are two main remedies for mis-statements in a prospectus:
- Civil liability. A person who has suffered loss or damage as a result of a mis-statement in a prospectus can sue the company, the directors of the company, and any other person who is responsible for the mis-statement.
- Criminal liability. A person who knowingly makes a mis-statement in a prospectus can be prosecuted and punished by imprisonment or fine.
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) on mis-statements in a prospectus and remedies
- Which of the following is not a remedy for mis-statements in a prospectus?
- Civil liability
- Criminal liability
- Rescission of the contract
- Damages
- The answer is (c). Rescission of the contract is not a remedy for mis-statements in a prospectus. This is because the contract is not voidable on the grounds of misrepresentation.
- A person buys shares in a company based on a prospectus that contains a mis-statement. The person suffers a loss as a result of the mis-statement. What are the possible remedies available to the person?
- The person can sue the company for damages.
- The person can sue the directors of the company for damages.
- The person can sue the expert who signed the prospectus for damages.
- All of the above
- The answer is (d). All of the above remedies are available to the person who has suffered loss as a result of a mis-statement in a prospectus.
- A company issues a prospectus that contains a mis-statement. The mis-statement is made by the company’s auditor. Is the auditor liable for the mis-statement?
- Yes
- No
- Only if the auditor knew about the mis-statement
- Only if the auditor was negligent in making the mis-statement
- The answer is (b). The auditor is not liable for the mis-statement unless they knew about the mis-statement or were negligent in making the mis-statement.
Answers
- (c)
- (d)
- (b)